Metro Vancouver Pulls Back on DCC Increases. What It Means for Development Land
- May 14
- 2 min read
Metro Vancouver has officially taken steps to reduce previously approved DCC increases for 2026 and 2027, a move that will likely be well received by many in the development community.
After significant industry pushback around escalating government charges and project viability, Metro Vancouver’s Board voted this week to roll back 2026 DCC increases to 2025 levels and reduce the size of the planned 2027 increases. The revised approach also extends the transition timeline toward a 1% assist factor out to 2029 rather than 2027.

The reductions are meaningful. Depending on the sewerage area, apartment DCCs are proposed to decrease by approximately 24% to 29% in 2026 versus previously approved rates, with additional reductions in 2027. Townhouse and single family lot DCCs are seeing similar reductions.



That said, the change does not come without tradeoffs.
Metro Vancouver estimates the rollback and reduction strategy will create a $389 million funding gap between 2026 and 2031. To address this, the region plans to increase long term borrowing for water and liquid waste infrastructure, while portions of park acquisition costs will shift to existing ratepayers through higher property taxes.

This decision reflects a growing recognition that rapidly increasing housing taxes have crippled development viability across Metro Vancouver. In many cases, the cumulative development fee burden has become the primary obstacle to getting projects moving, never mind the slowdown in project absorption and sales revenues.
While these fee reductions alone will not solve the broader affordability or supply challenges facing the market, they do represent a notable shift in tone. Municipalities and regional governments appear increasingly aware that if projects do not pencil, housing simply does not get built.
The revised DCC bylaws are currently awaiting Provincial approval and are expected to come into effect sometime this summer.



Comments